TAR SANDS

De tar sands is één van de grootste milieurampen van de afgelopen jaren. Canada stond altijd bekend om zijn progressieve natuurbehoud en om de relatief vriendelijke manier om met de first nation people om te gaan, ( in elk geval vriendelijker dan elders ter wereld ). Helaas is dat het de huidige regering anders. Verhalen rond corruptie maar vooral scrupuloos winstbejag zonder te kijken naar de consequenties in de ontginningsdrif rond fossiele energie. Tar sands en de XL pipeline zijn hot nieuws en het kan geen kwaad om er kennis van te nemen. Kunnen wij er wat tegen doen? Het is immers helemaal in Canada! Dat antwoord hebben wij hier ook niet voor u. Maar het slechtste wat u kunt doen is niets doen en schaapachtig blijven toekijken en denken dat het uw tijd wel zal duren, kijk maar naar de links op deze pagina.

Hieronder vindt u krantenartikelen, filmpjes enz enz over de Tar Sands

Klik hier voor een uitgebreide fotoserie van Tar Sands

 

augustus 2017 laatste nieuws en beelden over de tar sands klik hier

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mei 2016 weinig nieuws geplaatst, maar de tarsandsoap gaat gewoon door. Recente foto's van Alberta Ca. klik hier

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

september 2014 uitgebreid verslag van een reis samen met Di Caprio met een Canadese Indiaan naar de Tar Sands. klik hier

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

14 januari intervieuw met Neil Young over de Tar sands en Canada in het algemeen klik hier

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8 januari Niet te geloven wat een truck dit weer is. klik hier

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

14 oktober artikel over de gevolgen van de Tar Sands op de westkust van Canada. klik hier

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

29 juli film over de tar sands deel 1 en deel 2 klik hier en klik hier

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

21 juli artikel over de zorg van de first nation people elders over vervuiling door bitumen klik hier

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

20 juli een vervuiling die niemand begrijpt en doorgat omdat er niet een klep is de gesloten wordt of een kraan die kan worden dichtgedraaid. klik hier

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

15 juli  de ouderen bij de indianen vragen zich af hoe ze dit landschap ooit weer kunnen genezen. Krantenartikele en foto's klik hier

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

6 juli tar sands vieze waarheid klik hier filmpje van 10 minuten

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

15 juni geplaatst meer slecht nieuws tar sands klik hier

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15 juni tar sands wordt regelrechte ramp klik hier

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

geplaatst 13 juni 2013 morsing pipeline proceswater klik hier

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

geplaatst 29 mei 2013 http://www.healingwalk.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

geplaatst 27 mei 2013 artikel over de laatste ontwikkelingen The Beaver Lake Cree Judgment: The Most Important Tar Sands Case You’ve Never Heard Of. klik hier

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

geplaatst 1 mei: undercover at Tar Sands

April 26, 2013 4:25 PM ET

Editor's Note: In recent months, many climate activists have focused their efforts on Canada's tar sands and the companies set on extracting fossil fuels from them. With the debate raging louder than ever, Rolling Stone is in contact with one of the workers helping to build a pipeline to bring oil from the tar sands to the U.S. Read on for that anonymous correspondent's first dispatch from one of the world's most controversial jobs.

There's something in the air in Fort McMurray, Alberta – and it's not just fumes from the massive oil sands processing plants north of town. Spend enough time here, and you'll pick up the pungent scents of machismo and money.

This is the heart of Canada's controversial tar sands operation. If all goes as planned, this region will soon be sending its bitumen – the sticky, black petroleum byproduct colloquially known as "tar" – down the Keystone XL Pipeline. President Obama has yet to give the contentious project the green light, but work in the oil sands shows no sign of slowing down any time soon.

The region has 80,000 permanent residents, and hosts about 40,000 temporary workers at any given time – welders, pipefitters, heavy equipment operators, technicians, engineers and other hired hands who pass through Fort McMurray as the work ebbs and flows. I joined them this winter when, after hearing stories about Fort Mac for years, I signed on to help build a massive pipeline (not the Keystone XL). I was eager to see the tar sands for myself, experience life in Fort Mac firsthand – and, let's be honest, I wanted to make some oil money, too.  I'm writing this story anonymously to protect my friends, my colleagues and myself.

The Fossil Fuel Resistance

Much of the work here relies on ice roads and freezing temperatures, so when spring comes, the work ends. The obvious irony is that the carbon economy itself is very likely contributing to the early springs, late winters and wacky weather that keeps interrupting our work.

Few in northern Alberta seemed to notice when thousands gathered in Washington, D.C. to protest the Keystone project in February. Instead, everyone was talking about the southern extension project coming up later this year, and the 14,000 jobs it would bring.

The recent rupture of an Exxon pipeline in Arkansas, spilling tens of thousands of Canadian crude, made some noise here. But most chalked it up to "bad timing" –folks are quick to point out that the pipeline in question was installed in the 1940s, and my foreman assured us that Exxon would "make sure everyone is taken care of." The prevailing logic seems to be that if you throw enough money at a problem, it'll go away. 

People come from all over Canada to cash-in at "Fort McMoney." Entry-level laborers can make $400 or $500 a day after wages and the generous union-sanctioned living allowance. Even so, employers are constantly struggling to fill positions. There is simply too much work, and not enough people to do it.

Everyone here seems to have money – even the local McDonald's pays $14 an hour to start – but few people act like it. Eighty-six percent of Fort McMurray households reported incomes over $100,000 last year, and a whopping 25 percent of households brought in more than $250,000. Still, you don't see a lot of luxury cars or designer clothing up here. Instead, the local status symbol involves a massive 4x4 truck and lots of toys in the garage.

Despite all the money in town – or maybe because of it – Fort McMurray has plenty of problems. Figures from 2007 show the city had 215 percent more drug offences, 117 percent more impaired drivers, and 89 percent more assaults than the provincial average. I've seen enough during my short time here to know that booze, blow and bar fights remain common. It's easy to spot the company trucks as they sit in parking lots outside bars for hours every night; I wasn't on the job for a full week before my first coworker was fired for alleged DWI.

Most people go out to bullshit, drink beer and watch hockey – but the combination of alcohol and amped-up testosterone can be toxic. Some of the younger guys (and, yes, a few of the older ones, too) like to fight, so bumping into the wrong person or looking at someone the wrong way can be all it takes to send fists flying.

Cocaine isn't hard to find – all you have to do is walk into a bar and ask, "Where I can get some coke?" and someone will likely have the answer. There's no need to whisper in this town; you might as well be asking "Where's the rest room?" or "Who's playing tonight?"

You don't even need to go inside to get your fix. Drugs are readily available on the sidewalk at one rather notorious convenience store, and dealers sit in their vehicles outside grocery stores and tire shops in the middle of the afternoon.

Most oil sands jobs require pre-employment drug testing, so detox kits are readily available for those who need to, you know, study for the test. But every oil company has a different policy: Some let you use previous test results if you're coming directly from another job, while others are more diligent, and insist new hires take a fresh one. You're essentially good to go (and free to do whatever you want in the little time you have off) after your initial test, unless your employer requires re-tests every so often. I myself never did take a drug test, but I was one of the few who managed to slip through the cracks.

One of the big oil companies, Suncor Energy, tried to introduce random drug testing last year, but the labor union stepped in, saying random tests violate workers' rights. The judge agreed, but Suncor maintains random tests would increase workplace safety, and notes that three of its seven worksite fatalities since 2000 involved drugs or alcohol.

If you get into an accident on the job – whether you cut your finger or back your truck into something – you have to take another drug test. (The unions don't contest this one.) As a result, a lot of accidents go unreported, since many workers would rather suck up their injuries than risk flunking the pee test and losing their job. The slip-ups that do get reported are written up and become fodder for the next day's pre-shift meeting.

Each workday begins at 6:45 a.m. with the daily safety meeting. The foreman opens with what we refer to as his comedy routine, reading incident reports from the day before while we snicker at the stupidity involved. (A typical incident might have someone cutting a finger and needing stitches because they weren't following procedure; my favorite was when someone in a company truck rear-ended a company bus.) We all laugh about it, but safety is a major issue in this line of work, and we all know the dangers. We've had a few close calls ourselves, and another pipeline project made news in March after someone on the test crew made a simple rookie mistake and wound up dead.

Work starts immediately after the morning meeting, and we do our respective tasks until 5 p.m. on a good day – later on a bad day. The days can be long, tedious, and cold – the mercury dips below -20 F in the winter – but the paychecks are worth it. People work a variety of shifts depending on what they do for which company; I myself work six days a week, sometimes seven. Days off are for catching up on sleep and/or nursing hangovers.

My crew is a mix of fresh-faced younger guys and older, well-seasoned vets. Female workers are rare, but not unheard of. Meanwhile, everyone seems to have a plan, whether it's "work a few months, then take a few months off," or "work 'til this job's done, then head to the next."

Broken marriages are one of the oil boom's many casualties. Sometimes women come here with their husbands, only to leave a few months later. The long hours and Fort Mac lifestyle aren't for everyone. One company newsletter quoted an employee saying it was his goal to "outlive both of my ex-wives."

Many couples come here on what's known as "The Five-Year Plan." Take, for example, a husband and wife team from Manitoba: They're both in their forties and have a nice house back home, but they rented an apartment in Fort Mac a few years ago in hopes of accelerating their retirement. Here, they both make more than $200,000 a year – she drives an enormous, Tonka-like truck that hauls 245 metric tons of bitumen at a time, and he's a shift supervisor – and their respective salaries are far more than what they could ever earn in Manitoba, combined. Like many others, they plan to do this for five years, then cash out. Whether they stick to that schedule remains to be seen. It's easy to get addicted to the money, and lots of five-year plans turn to 10-year plans in Fort Mac.

No one on my crew plans on being here for the long haul. After months of early mornings, long days and northern isolation, we're all itching to go home – or maybe to Vegas to blow off some steam. Fort Mac isn't really home for any of us. It's a paycheck, and a nice, big one at that. Whether working here is the right thing to do for the environment, well, that's a whole other question.



Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/undercover-at-the-tar-sands-20130426#ixzz2S1r8uTHN
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

-------------------------------------------------------------------

geplaatst 22 april 2013

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation's Constitutional Challenge

Comment on this StoryEmail this story
Athabasca Oil Sands

In the latest development in a case that began more than a year ago, the Supreme Court of Canada has decided it won’t hear the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation’s appeal of the Joint Review Panel’s refusal to hear the ACFN’s constitutional challenge of the Jackpine Mine expansion project in their territory. 
    

Athabasca Chipewyan Chief Allan Adam expected little more from the Harper administration.
 “It just goes to show that this government is a racist and fascist government and will continue to be so as long as it’s in power.”

In a story that mirrors the nation’s Treaty 8 relationship with the Government of Canada, Shell Oil Canada entered into a series of agreements with the ACFN prior to beginning the expansion project—including providing resources for community members to be involved in discussions, the mapping of traditional territories and commitments to trace the project’s impact on sacred sites—after years of broken commitments, the ACFN decided to take action.
    

In October 2012, the Athabasca Chipewyan nation filed a constitutional challenge to rule on whether the Crown had adequately fulfilled its duty to consult with First Nations on development that would affect traditional territories. When the JRP ruled that it had no jurisdiction to make the judgment, the ACFN applied to stay the proceedings; this was also denied. 
    

The claim that the JRP lacked the jurisdiction to intervene on the case came in spite of a Supreme Court decision from three years ago, Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal, that stated that any tribunal that has been granted the power to determine questions of law and public interest is thereby given the power to assess constitutional questions before the tribunal, including assessing whether the Crown has fulfilled its duty to consult with First Nations.
    

The ACFN turned to the Alberta Court of Appeals and then, in January, the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court stated that the matter is not of national import and therefore not within its jurisdiction. The decision means the federal court is placing responsibility for Indigenous rights in the hands of the province.
    

Adam believes this decision means the end of the line when it comes to using the court system to defend land rights.

“There’s no other legal action that can be taken. What's the use in taking legal action in terms of how we move forward?” he said. “First Nations people will never get justice and we continue to take that into consideration.”

The outcome of this process is indicative of a double standard when it comes to Canadians’ constitutional rights. Adam said this series of decisions from multiple levels of the legal system shows how the government and the Crown view of First Nations rights.
 “We have to look at that fact in more ways than one. First Nations in Canada, Indigenous people in Commonwealth countries that are involved with treaties with Great Britain, will never get justice because it’s a racist democracy.”

Having all but exhausted the legal avenues available, some within the nation see direct action as the only feasible next step. Defenders of the Land, a network of Indigenous activists established in 2008, has joined forces with Idle No More founders to build an initiative called Sovereignty Summer, a plan of non-violent direct action to challenge “illegitimate corporate power.”
    

Adam said he doesn’t support any action that could lead to violence, but anticipates seeing more direct action as the temperature rises.

“Summer is approaching quickly. Don’t be surprised to see more people out in the streets across the country, and don’t be surprised if major development areas get shut down.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------